The Streaming Wars Are Over. Nobody Won.
Streaming wars end with no winner after $200B spent. Netflix, Disney+, and rivals retrench as subscribers pay higher prices for fragmented content.
The Streaming Wars Are Over. Nobody Won.
Category: culture Tags: Entertainment, Streaming, Media---
The streaming revolution promised to liberate viewers from the tyranny of cable bundles and appointment television. Instead, it has delivered something arguably worse: a fragmented landscape where subscribing to "everything" costs more than the old cable packages ever did, and where the content you loved yesterday might vanish tomorrow due to licensing disputes or cost-cutting measures. The major platforms—Netflix, Disney+, Max, Paramount+, Peacock, and Apple TV+—have spent billions chasing subscriber growth, only to discover that most households have finite budgets and even more finite attention spans.
What emerged from this half-decade of competition is not a victor, but a stalemate. Netflix remains the largest player by subscriber count, yet its pivot to ad-supported tiers and password-sharing crackdowns reveals a company no longer confident in its original growth trajectory. Disney+, despite housing the most valuable intellectual property catalog in entertainment history, has struggled to achieve profitability and recently began licensing its content to competitors—a move that would have been unthinkable three years ago. The others occupy various positions between "struggling" and "existential question mark," with consolidation rumors now swirling around Paramount and Peacock.
The realignment has fundamentally altered how content gets made. The "streaming bubble" of 2019-2022, when platforms greenlit virtually any project with recognizable talent attached, has definitively burst. Writers' rooms have shrunk, episode counts have dropped, and international co-productions have become the norm as companies desperately seek to amortize costs across multiple markets. The creative middle class—showrunners and writers who weren't household names but consistently delivered quality work—has been hollowed out, replaced by a barbell structure of mega-deals for established stars and bare-bones productions for cost-conscious genres like unscripted content and reality television.
Perhaps most tellingly, the streaming era has failed to produce a sustainable economic model for the artists whose work powers the entire enterprise. Residual payments, once the financial bedrock of working actors and writers, have been systematically eroded by streaming-specific contract language. The 2023 writers' and actors' strikes brought these issues to the forefront, resulting in modest gains that many industry veterans consider insufficient. Meanwhile, the data opacity that streaming platforms have fiercely guarded—refusing to share precise viewership figures even with the creators themselves—has made it impossible to negotiate from a position of knowledge. The result is an industry where success is increasingly difficult to define, let alone achieve.
---
Related Reading
- The Best Netflix Shows of 2026 (So Far) - The College Degree Is Losing Its Value. Heres Why. - The Sound of Silence: AI, Music, and the Fight for the Human Voice - China Bans AI-Generated News Entirely. State Media Must Use Human Journalists Only. - 30% of New Spotify Uploads Are Now AI-Generated. Most Listeners Can't Tell.
---